W
WLC

Topic

clinical trials

6 articles on clinical trials in longevity medicine. View all news →

Life Biosciences: First patient dosed in Phase 1 trial of ER-100

ER-100 First Patient Dosed: What Partial Epigenetic Reprogramming Means for Longevity Clinics

Life Biosciences has dosed the first participant in its ER-100 Phase 1 trial, moving partial epigenetic reprogramming from FDA clearance to active human testing.

ScienceDaily: Scientists say NAD+ could slow aging and fight Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Peer-reviewed

NAD+ and Alzheimer's: What the Latest Research Actually Shows (2026)

A March 2026 Nature Aging review by 25+ scientists from the University of Oslo and international collaborators consolidates the evidence for NAD+ in neurodegenerative disease. Here's what the science says — and what it doesn't.

Lifespan.io: Cellular Senescence and Senotherapeutics: The Expert Roundup Peer-reviewed

Senolytics in 2026: Clinical Trials, Failures, and What Longevity Clinics Are Actually Offering

Senolytics promised to extend healthspan by clearing senescent cells. But recent clinical trial setbacks have cooled the hype. Here's the real state of the field in 2026: which companies are advancing, what failed, what clinics offer, and what the science actually supports.

UT Health San Antonio Peer-reviewed

Rapamycin Goes Mainstream: UT Health San Antonio Launches Large-Scale Clinical Trial

UT Health San Antonio launches a National Institute on Aging-funded rapamycin trial with 84 older adults—one of the largest longevity-focused clinical studies to date. The shift: from off-label speculation to evidence-based dosing.

ARPA-H Peer-reviewed

ARPA-H Commits $144 Million to the First Clinical Trials Designed to Extend Healthspan

The U.S. government's ARPA-H launches the PROSPR program: $144M over five years to identify early aging biomarkers and run the first clinical trials explicitly aimed at extending healthy lifespan.

Nature Metabolism / PubMed Peer-reviewed

NAD+ in Humans: The Review That Cuts Through the Hype (Nature Metabolism, 2025)

A systematic review in Nature Metabolism concludes that clinical evidence for NAD+ supplementation in humans remains scarce and results are heterogeneous. More research needed.