Data-driven
Clinic Rankings
Sort, filter, and visualize 55 longevity clinics across every dimension that matters: editorial score, price, features, Google reviews, and years of operation.
Category
Price
Region
55 clinics shown
| # | Name↕ | Country↕ | Category↕ | WLC Score↓ | Google↕ | Price↕ | Features↕ | Rooms↕ | Doctors↕ | Luxury↕ | Food↕ | Tech↕ | Research↕ | Est.↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Clinique La PrairieMontreux | Switzerland | residential | 84 | 4.5 | $$$$ | 8/15 | -- | -- | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 1931 |
| 2 |  LanserhofBest OverallLans | Austria | residential | 84 | 4.4 | $$$$ | 7/15 | -- | -- | 9 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 1989 |
| 3 |  Cleveland Clinic Executive HealthTop DiagnosticsCleveland | United States | outpatient | 84 | 3.4 | $$$ | 1/15 | -- | -- | 6 | -- | 10 | 10 | 1921 |
| 4 |  ProgevitaBest ValueValencia | Spain | residential | 83 | 4.9 | $ | 14/15 | -- | -- | 5 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1989 |
| 5 |  Human Longevity Inc.San Diego | United States | outpatient | 82 | 4 | $$$ | 5/15 | -- | -- | 7 | -- | 9 | 9 | 2013 |
| 6 |  Sheba Longevity CenterRamat Gan | Israel | outpatient | 81 | 4.2 | $$ | 5/15 | -- | -- | 6 | -- | 9 | 10 | 2023 |
| 7 |  Early MedicalTop InnovationAustin | United States | outpatient | 79 | -- | $$$$ | 4/15 | -- | -- | 6 | -- | 7 | 6 | 2019 |
| 8 |  Mayo Clinic Executive HealthTop ResearchRochester | United States | outpatient | 79 | -- | $$$ | 2/15 | -- | -- | 5 | -- | 9 | 10 | 1889 |
| 9 |  YEARSBerlin | Germany | outpatient | 79 | 4.9 | $$ | 4/15 | -- | -- | 7 | -- | 8 | 2 | 2023 |
| 10 | Chaum Seoul | South Korea | outpatient | 78 | 3.2 | $$ | 5/15 | -- | -- | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 2012 |
| 11 |  Conradia Medical PreventionHamburg | Germany | outpatient | 78 | 4.7 | $$ | 1/15 | -- | -- | 7 | -- | 9 | 4 | 2005 |
| 12 |  Nescens Clinique de GenolierGenolier | Switzerland | residential | 78 | -- | $$$$ | 5/15 | -- | -- | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 1994 |
| 13 |  HOOKELondon | United Kingdom | outpatient | 78 | -- | $$$ | 2/15 | -- | -- | 8 | -- | 8 | 7 | 2023 |
| 14 | SHA Wellness Clinic Alfaz del Pi | Spain | residential | 77 | 4.6 | $$ | 9/15 | -- | -- | 9 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 2008 |
| 15 |  BiographNew York | United States | outpatient | 77 | -- | $$$ | 4/15 | -- | -- | 9 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 2025 |
| 16 |  Princeton Longevity CenterPrinceton | United States | outpatient | 77 | 4.2 | $$$ | 3/15 | -- | -- | 6 | -- | 8 | 7 | 2002 |
| 17 |  Aviv ClinicsThe Villages | United States | outpatient | 76 | 3.7 | $$$$ | 3/15 | -- | -- | 7 | -- | 8 | 9 | 2020 |
| 18 |  Prevention Clinic TokyoTokyo | Japan | outpatient | 76 | -- | $$$ | 3/15 | -- | -- | 10 | -- | 9 | 5 | 2020 |
| 19 |  SoLongevityMilan | Italy | outpatient | 76 | 4.4 | $ | 2/15 | -- | -- | 6 | -- | 7 | 7 | 2020 |
| 20 |  Buchinger WilhelmiUberlingen | Germany | residential | 75 | 4.5 | $$ | 3/15 | -- | -- | 6 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 1953 |
| 21 |  CenegenicsLas Vegas | United States | outpatient | 75 | 4.8 | $$$ | 3/15 | -- | -- | 6 | -- | 6 | 5 | 1997 |
| 22 |  Pura LongevityAbu Dhabi | United Arab Emirates | outpatient | 75 | -- | $$ | 4/15 | -- | -- | 7 | -- | 8 | 4 | 2024 |
| 23 |  ANOVA InstituteOffenbach | Germany | outpatient | 75 | 4.5 | $$ | 2/15 | -- | -- | 5 | -- | 8 | 9 | 2014 |
| 24 |  Healthy Longevity ClinicPrague | Czech Republic | outpatient | 75 | 4.9 | $$$$ | 1/15 | -- | -- | 6 | -- | 8 | 5 | 2021 |
| 25 |  Eterna HealthToronto | Canada | outpatient | 74 | 4.9 | $$ | 4/15 | -- | -- | 7 | -- | 8 | 5 | 2022 |
| 26 | Chenot Palace Weggis Weggis | Switzerland | residential | 73 | 4.7 | $$$ | 6/15 | -- | -- | 10 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 2020 |
| 27 |  MAYR LifeAltaussee | Austria | residential | 73 | 4.6 | $$ | 3/15 | -- | -- | 8 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 2019 |
| 28 |  Next HealthLos Angeles | United States | outpatient | 73 | 4.9 | $ | 9/15 | -- | -- | 7 | -- | 6 | 2 | 2017 |
| 29 |  Elitra HealthNew York | United States | outpatient | 73 | 5 | $$$ | 2/15 | -- | -- | 10 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 2019 |
| 30 |  Longevity CenterZurich | Switzerland | outpatient | 73 | 4.9 | $$$ | 4/15 | -- | -- | 8 | -- | 7 | 5 | 2020 |
| 31 |  Fountain LifeNaples | United States | outpatient | 72 | -- | $$$ | 4/15 | -- | -- | 7 | -- | 9 | 2 | 2021 |
| 32 |  PALM HealthSt. Louis | United States | outpatient | 72 | 4.8 | $ | 2/15 | -- | -- | 8 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 2019 |
| 33 |  RoseBar at Six Senses IbizaIbiza | Spain | residential | 72 | 4.6 | $$ | 4/15 | -- | -- | 10 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 2022 |
| 34 |  Chi LongevityBangkok | Thailand | outpatient | 71 | 4.8 | $$ | 10/15 | -- | -- | 8 | -- | 7 | 7 | 2018 |
| 35 |  Stem Cell Institute PanamaPanama City | Panama | outpatient | 71 | 4.2 | $$ | 2/15 | -- | -- | 5 | -- | 7 | 8 | 2007 |
| 36 |  PrenuvoSan Francisco | United States | outpatient | 71 | -- | $ | 2/15 | -- | -- | 5 | -- | 7 | 5 | 2018 |
| 37 |  Wild HealthLexington | United States | outpatient | 71 | 4.2 | $ | 2/15 | -- | -- | 4 | -- | 5 | 3 | 2018 |
| 38 |  Miskawaan Health GroupBangkok | Thailand | outpatient | 71 | 4.5 | $$ | 4/15 | -- | -- | 8 | -- | 6 | 3 | 2016 |
| 39 |  AEON ClinicDubai | United Arab Emirates | outpatient | 71 | 5 | $$ | 3/15 | -- | -- | 10 | -- | 8 | 3 | 2023 |
| 40 |  LONVIDAMexico City | Mexico | outpatient | 71 | 5 | $ | 6/15 | -- | -- | 8 | -- | 7 | 3 | 2023 |
| 41 | Biocure Dubai | United Arab Emirates | outpatient | 70 | 4.7 | $$ | 9/15 | -- | -- | 7 | -- | 6 | 2 | 2019 |
| 42 |  Maison EpigeneticParis | France | outpatient | 70 | 4.6 | $ | 3/15 | -- | -- | 9 | -- | 6 | 3 | 2022 |
| 43 |  The Hundred Longevity HouseTokyo | Japan | outpatient | 69 | -- | $$ | 2/15 | -- | -- | 9 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 2024 |
| 44 |  Nuffield Medical LongevitySingapore | Singapore | outpatient | 69 | 4.5 | $ | 4/15 | -- | -- | 6 | -- | 6 | 2 | 2022 |
| 45 |  ViaviLondon | United Kingdom | outpatient | 69 | 4.7 | $$$ | 2/15 | -- | -- | 7 | -- | 7 | 3 | 2015 |
| 46 |  Palazzo FiuggiFiuggi | Italy | residential | 69 | 4.5 | $$$ | 4/15 | -- | -- | 10 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 2021 |
| 47 |  BiongevityDubai | United Arab Emirates | outpatient | 68 | -- | $$ | 5/15 | -- | -- | 6 | -- | 7 | 2 | 2024 |
| 48 |  10X Health SystemAventura | United States | outpatient | 67 | 4 | $ | 3/15 | -- | -- | 7 | -- | 5 | 1 | 2020 |
| 49 |  The Longevity SuiteMilan | Italy | outpatient | 67 | 4.3 | $ | 3/15 | -- | -- | 7 | -- | 6 | 2 | 2020 |
| 50 |  The Longevity LabLondon | United Kingdom | outpatient | 66 | 4.8 | $$ | 7/15 | -- | -- | 5 | -- | 4 | 1 | 2021 |
| 51 |  Function HealthSan Francisco | United States | outpatient | 66 | -- | $ | 1/15 | -- | -- | 3 | -- | 7 | 3 | 2022 |
| 52 |  Humanaut HealthAustin | United States | outpatient | 66 | 4.8 | $$ | 2/15 | -- | -- | 7 | -- | 6 | 1 | 2024 |
| 53 |  AYUNZurich | Switzerland | outpatient | 66 | 4.8 | $$ | 2/15 | -- | -- | 7 | -- | 7 | 3 | 2023 |
| 54 |  Forever HealthDallas | United States | outpatient | 63 | 4.4 | $$ | 7/15 | -- | -- | 4 | -- | 3 | 1 | 2018 |
| 55 |  BiocannoveaVienna | Austria | outpatient | 60 | 3.8 | $$ | 1/15 | -- | -- | 4 | -- | 3 | 1 | 2018 |
How we rank longevity clinics
Ranking longevity clinics is harder than ranking restaurants or hotels because the same clinic can be the right answer for one patient and the wrong answer for another. A 70-year-old looking for an annual residential reset has very different needs from a 38-year-old high-performer looking for a tech-enabled outpatient relationship. The WLC ranking is therefore designed to give you a defensible starting point rather than a single "best clinic" answer.
Our editorial team scores each clinic against seven independent dimensions on a 0-100 scale. Clinical substance measures how rigorous and complete the diagnostic workflow is, how well-staffed the medical team is, and how clearly the clinic stands behind evidence-based protocols. Treatment breadth counts how many of the 15 core longevity capabilities (full-body MRI, epigenetic testing, telomere analysis, stem cell, NAD+, hyperbaric, IV, peptide, hormone, cryotherapy, gene editing, neurofeedback, personalized nutrition, sleep optimization, DEXA and VO2 max) are actually delivered on-site. Research track record rewards clinics that publish in peer-reviewed journals and run their own protocols rather than reselling third-party diagnostics.
We also apply evidence guardrails to avoid over-scoring fashionable diagnostics or therapies. According to the National Institute on Aging, aging biomarkers are still being validated across human populations and longitudinal cohorts, so biological-age claims do not receive automatic credit unless a clinic explains how results change care. The American College of Radiology says there is not yet enough evidence to recommend total-body MRI screening for asymptomatic people, so imaging programs are scored on physician review and follow-up quality rather than scan availability alone. For regenerative medicine, the U.S. FDA warns that many stem cell and exosome products are marketed without proof of safety or effectiveness; WLC therefore separates regulated clinical use from marketing language. For fitness testing, peer-reviewed work indexed by PubMed Central describes VO2 max as a direct measure of cardiorespiratory fitness associated with health, so clinics get more credit when VO2 max is interpreted alongside coaching, risk review, and follow-up metrics.
| Evidence area | Reference signal | What earns ranking credit | What caps ranking credit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aging biomarkers | NIA notes that stronger biomarkers of aging still need validation across populations and longitudinal studies. | Biomarker panels tied to physician interpretation, care-plan changes, and repeat testing cadence. | Marketing a single biological-age score as a diagnosis or guaranteed longevity outcome. |
| Total-body MRI | ACR does not recommend total-body MRI screening for asymptomatic people without stronger evidence. | Radiologist review, risk stratification, escalation pathways, and clear false-positive counseling. | Offering scans as a standalone premium add-on without documented medical follow-up. |
| Regenerative medicine | FDA warns that many stem cell and exosome products are marketed without proven safety or effectiveness. | Transparent regulatory status, informed consent, physician supervision, and conservative indications. | Broad anti-aging claims for unapproved products or protocols with unclear sourcing. |
| VO2 max and fitness testing | Peer-reviewed literature describes VO2 max as a direct cardiorespiratory fitness measure associated with health. | Testing paired with coaching, risk review, retesting, and longitudinal performance targets. | Reporting a number without interpretation, intervention planning, or follow-up metrics. |
- Diagnostics: breadth, physician interpretation, and repeatability of tests such as DEXA, VO2 max, blood biomarkers, imaging, and epigenetic panels.
- Interventions: whether therapies are evidence-grounded, medically supervised, and matched to patient goals instead of sold as one-size-fits-all packages.
- Follow-up: written action plans, remote monitoring, lab retesting cadence, and continuity after a 3-day, 7-day, or annual residential program.
Patient experience covers hospitality (rooms, food, service), accessibility (transfers, languages, scheduling), and the quality of the post-stay follow-up plan. Value proposition compares total program cost against treatment depth at the same luxury tier. Methodology looks at how individualized and transparent the protocol design is for each patient. Innovation rewards adoption of new but evidence-grounded technologies (AI-driven longevity analytics, novel biomarkers, integrated wearables) without giving credit for cosmetic gimmickry.
The seven dimensions are visible on every clinic profile under the WLC Editorial Review section, alongside the verdict and the dated review body. Rankings update whenever a profile is reviewed or a clinic materially changes its menu or pricing. Editorial independence is enforced: clinics cannot pay for placement, scoring, or preferential treatment in any of our comparison or alternatives pages.
Ranking methodology FAQ
Common questions about the WLC ranking system, scoring methodology, and editorial independence.
How is the WLC Editorial Score calculated?
The WLC Editorial Score is a 0 to 100 composite built from seven weighted dimensions: clinical substance (depth and rigor of diagnostics), treatment breadth (how many of the 15 core longevity capabilities are offered), research track record (published studies and proprietary protocols), patient experience (hospitality, food, accessibility, follow-up), value proposition (treatment depth relative to price), methodology (how transparent and individualized the protocol design is), and innovation (adoption of cutting-edge but evidence-grounded therapies). Each dimension is scored independently by our editorial team and the components are visible on every clinic profile.
What evidence sources influence the ranking?
WLC uses public medical and scientific references as guardrails, including National Institute on Aging guidance on aging biomarkers, American College of Radiology guidance on screening total-body MRI, FDA consumer warnings on regenerative medicine products, and peer-reviewed literature on VO2 max as a cardiorespiratory fitness marker. These sources do not create automatic winners; they determine where we require physician interpretation, safety oversight, follow-up, and transparent patient selection before awarding credit.
Why does the ranking change over time?
Rankings are not static. Clinic positions shift as we publish new editorial reviews, as clinics add or remove treatments, as price changes are reported, and as new clinics enter the directory. Every clinic profile shows a "last reviewed" date so you can see how recent the assessment is.
Are these rankings paid placements?
No. World Longevity Clinics is editorially independent. Clinics can claim and verify their profile (which adds a verification badge and lets them keep their information accurate) but no clinic can buy a higher ranking, a higher score, or preferential placement. Editorial reviews are written without clinic involvement.
Should I just go with the top-ranked clinic?
Not necessarily. The overall ranking is a useful starting point, but the right clinic for you depends on your specific goals (diagnostics, regenerative, recovery, weight loss, longevity baseline), your budget tier, and your preferred location and stay format. Use the filters and the comparison tools to narrow down to a shortlist, then read the full editorial reviews and FAQs on each clinic profile before deciding.